The Simpsons referenced the Workshop last week. Love it!

Yup.

(A reminder: I’m still fundraising for Clarion. No donation is too small. Donations over $50 get an original work of microfiction in their thank-you note!)

Endings

I read Roald Dahl’s The Witches many times as a child. Despite loving it, I always had difficulty with the ending.

For those of you who have never read The Witches (and if you haven’t, you should – stop reading this post, which contains spoilers about the ending, and pick it up!), the basic plot is this: a young boy and his beloved grandmother enter into a battle with the witches of England. They come out victorious, but the boy has been turned into a mouse.

The ending is bittersweet because even though the boy is permanently a mouse, he muses that it’s actually quite perfect because the life expectancy of a mouse is similar to the amount of time that his grandmother has left on this earth, so they won’t be alive without the other for very long.

As a kid, this ending upset me. A lot. It disrupted the saccharine, clean narratives of less interesting books and movies to which I was also exposed. Only as an adult do I really appreciate how good it is – how rare a gift it is to fill readers with such a sense of disquiet. Roald Dahl is the master of the macabre ending, but too often parents find these sorts of unpleasant endings objectionable – something their children shouldn’t be exposed to. But how else do you prepare children for a world in which nothing wraps up neatly?

As some of you may have heard, this summer I will be attending the Clarion Science Fiction & Fantasy Writers’ Workshop. Held on the UC-San Diego campus from late June to early August, the program brings together writers of speculative and fantastic fiction from all over the world, and I’m so excited to be a part of it.

I have already received generous funding from the Susan C. Petrey Scholarship Fund and the Clarion Foundation, but I still have $2,457.00 in tuition to cover, as well as travel expenses. I am writing to ask if you would consider making a donation on my behalf – no amount is too small. If I receive more money than I need, I’ll donate the extra to Clarion to help fund its future students.

You can donate here. Feel free to share this post via your Facebook page or Twitter. Also, for donations of $50 or over, I will include a microfiction in your thank-you card! (Make sure you give me your address.)

Thank you so much for your time and support.

I recently stumbled on this article on The Daily Beast: 22 More Reasons to Stop Writing.

From a glance at that list (and the website that inspired it), it would seem that most of the people Pamela Redmond and the original blogger are discouraging from writing are people who actually aren’t interested in being writers, but in the romantic idea of being a writer. “You Think Anyone Can Be a Writer,” “You Don’t Buy Books (So Why Would Anyone Buy Yours?),” “You Don’t Read What You’re Writing,” “You’re a Cliche Abuser”… none of these apply to me or any of the people I know who are seriously pursuing writing as an actual profession.

There is a percentage of the population who think that being a writer is sitting down jauntily at a typewriter for a few hours, writing something brilliant, and dashing it off to the New Yorker for a giant check, instead of knowing that 1.) Writers read a lot, 2.) Writers write a lot. Both of which seem obvious to me, but not to someone who doesn’t understand what writing entails. (And I think that reason that this is so common is that being an astronaut, or a doctor, or a hundred other things, requires a known set of skills – everyone knows you can’t just quit your job and go be an astronaut, because you have to have a certain background in math and science and lots of school and degrees. But because writing doesn’t need any of those things – plenty of writers have no formal schooling of any kind – that translates in people’s brains to: “I can just become a writer!” Which is to say that people assume that “no formal training” = “anyone can do it,” which is obviously not true)

And even the ones that do apply to people pursuing writing as a profession — “13. Whatever you write today, you’re just going to hate tomorrow anyway” — yeah, okay. That’s definitely part of the process. But it doesn’t always happen, and you know what? Sometimes you’ve gotta push through stuff that you’re not sure about. Sometimes, a project that you’re sick of looking at will be fresh and wonderful to a reader.

So, to adapt what Pamela Redmond is saying: If you don’t realize what being a writer actually entails, then yes, please stop writing. If not – keep going. Don’t stop don’t stop don’t stop.

I just found out that my story “Difficult at Parties” has been accepted for publication by Unstuck Books. (Two acceptances in one day! I should have bought a lottery ticket last week.)

Unstuck is a great new magazine that was mentioned in the New York Times earlier this year as “devoted to breaking down traditional genre fiction barriers.” (And is, along with its listmates, a “really good read.”)

Thank you to all of the readers and editors. I’m honored to have my work featured in Unstuck.

“Down”

I just found out that “Down” has been accepted for publication by the Indiana Review!

Thank you to all of the readers and editors. I’m honored to have my work featured in IR.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.